I remember mediocre reading reviews for The Virgin Suicides, that described it as being ‘moody, atmospheric and pointless’. To which my reaction was: ‘Count Me In’. I went to the film and adored it, but when friends I mentioned it to didn’t, I had no easy way to justify my feelings.
About a month ago I got this email from Aram in New York:
I saw Northfork. I think you guys will like it. It’s kind of weird. Like a David Lynch movie but without the sex and violence. But it’s visually stunning. Really. Very cool flick.
There is quite a lag between when movies appear in the Big Apple and in Chapel Hill, so Northfork just opened here.
I can see why Aram’s would have thought that I would like it. Visually the movie is gorgeous and quite unlike anything I have seen before. The same could be said for the story, which is full of clever twists and takes place in a fantasy world that is self-contained and somehow logical. (Both of these facts also inform the comparison to Lynch that Aram and a number of other people make, although I would not have thought of it myself. I don’t see Lynch films as allegories, and it is hard to think of Northfork as anything else. The film that I would compare, Picnic at Hanging Rock, it to was not mentioned in any of the reviews I read.) Were a filmmaker to use me as a one-person focus group in producing a new film, they would probably end up with something resembling this one.
Which is why I am surprised at how little I like it. Despite its interesting elements and great intentions, I am quite reluctant to call it a good film.
I can think of many reasons for this. The biggest being the script, which is oddly paced, serves little real purpose, and is filled with banal dialog that the actors read with all the emotion of a press secretary (think of Tom Hanks in Road to Predition). Much of the clever imagery seems purposeless, and the key images are dwelled on so many times that one is forced to notice exactly what the director wants. There is little opportunity or motivation for the audience to identify with any of the characters. And yet, I feel disingenuous giving any of them, because they were all faults others identified in films I loved and I defended for ‘working’ as a cohesive piece of art. For me, Northfork just doesn’t work. (A number of glowing reviews show that I have some company here but am probably in the minority.) The good parts make it worth seeing, but I don’t feel any lasting impact.
When it comes to a film as distinctive as this, I can simply gasp at the ones that I identify with and puzzle about the ones which I don’t. I am equally inarticulate in both cases. That probably means I would make a bad critic. I can live with that.
Rating: 5/10